Channel 4 rejects Islamophobia claims….Islamophobia Watch unsurprisingly not best pleased

They would be happier if Channel 4 just held their hands up and said “Yeah we hate Muslims and want everyone else too as well”..

Channel 4 rejects ‘Islamophobia’ claims

Undercover%20Mosque.JPGThe Channel 4 deputy head of news and current affairs, Kevin Sutcliffe, today dismissed accusations of Islamophobia in the broadcaster’s programming, stating that it would remain “fearless” in its coverage.

Mr Sutcliffe, one of five panelists involved at a sometimes heated session at the MediaGuardian Edinburgh international television festival about the portrayal of Islam in the media, said critics would be “hard pressed to point to Islamophobia” in Channel 4’s programming.

“We have a rounded view and approach to this issue … we are quite fearless about what we want to say and when we want to say it,” he added. In response to the Crown Prosecution Service criticism that the controversial Dispatches documentary Undercover Mosque had “distorted” the views of those filmed, Mr Sutcliffe said it was a “phoney argument”.

Inayat Bunglawala, assistant secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, agreed that following events such as 9/11 and the bombings in Madrid and London it was “inevitable” there would be an “increased scrutiny of Muslim organisations and mosques”.

However, he said that he was “entitled to ask if it is fair”. He then stated that Muslims and Islam “does not have a level playing field in the media in this country”. Mr Bunglawala expressed concern over “authored documentaries” in which “journalists have an axe to grind”. He cited a Panorama documentary by John Ware as an example.

Maryam Namazie, spokesperson of the Council of ex-Muslims of Britain, strongly disagreed, arguing that the UK media was too soft in its coverage of Islam. “Media doesn’t cover the realities of Islam at all, it is very soft,” she said. She added that the political Islamist movement in Britain and Europe had engineered a “victim status”, whereby criticism of Islam was being equated to racism against Muslims. “Criticising a belief is not racism, it is not the case that that Muslims are being vilified,” Ms Namazie said.

Guardian, 24 August 2007

If there’s one thing that illustrates the problem with the attitudes to Islam to be found in liberal media circles, it’s the fact that a sectarian lunatic like Namazie who represents nothing and nobody is given a platform at an event like this, as if she had something serious to contribute to the debate.

See also Inayat Bunglawala’s post at Comment is Free, 24 August 2007 

Islamophobia Watch would have given the Meida Guardian Edinborough festival event about the portrayal of Islam better coverage if everyone agreed that Islam is the best thing in the world ever and anything and everything said by a Muslim is good and anyone who says different is an Islamophobic Muslim hating racist!

No surprises they take pot shots at the Council Of Ex Muslims. They are lunatics for wanting the seperation of religion and the state? Oh of course!

IW link an article by the MCB’s Inyat Bunglawala. But he surely doesn’t share their views that nobody should criticise anything said by Muslims ever as he advocates the media having the freedom to investigate whether some mosques are inciting hatred.

He’s right when he says that it has too be fair but people like Islamophobia Watch would prefer it not to be done at all fair or not as they believe that because Muslims are victims of racism to investigate their places of worships for evidence of any wrong doing is racist!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: